Saucony Mirage: A minimalist shoe for everyday running



The Saucony Progrid Mirage (men's)

MSRP $100
Saucony
http://www.saucony.com/

HIGH EXPECTATIONS
I've tried a lot of running shoes and now know instantly if a shoe is good or bad for me. Once a shoe is judged to be good, the challenge is to discover just how good it really is. When everything comes together perfectly, the runner finds their perfect shoe. In my case it's the Saucony Kinvara, a lightly constructed minimalist trainer. I was curious to see how Saucony's newest minimalist shoe stacked up to the Kinvara and to the other shoes I've tested.

THE SAUCONY PROGRID MIRAGE
When Saucony offered to send their new Mirage, a minimal shoe that's a close cousin to the Kinvara, I jumped at the chance. Unlike the Kinvara, the Mirage includes a medial stability post. However, this shoe is not simply a more stable version of the Kinvara, it's an entirely different running shoe. I realized this the moment I took it the out of the box.

My initial comments on the Emerging Runner: "The shoes, in jet black with bright red mid-soles, were far different from the Kinvara in look and feel. While the Kinvara is a super light shoe with a very minimal upper, the Mirage feels beefier with a more conventional upper and more structure on the medial side for stability. This combination adds weight to the shoe (7.7 oz for Kinvara vs 9.6 oz for the Mirage)."

FIRST IMPRESSIONS
When I removed the Mirage from its box I could tell right away that it was a well designed shoe. My first impression, once I'd laced up both shoes, was how different it felt from the Kinvara. The Kinvara is neutral in feel, flat, but not without cushioning. The Mirage felt similarly balanced but the mid-sole on the forefoot seemed thicker, as if to facilitate landing towards the front. The wrap was good, but compared to the Kinvara, the Mirage's toe box was a bit narrow. This has not been a problem and I have not suffered any discomfort from that. I just prefer a wider toe box. I thought I would also have an issue with the collar rubbing the side of my ankle but that problem went away after a few weeks.

FIRST EXPERIENCE
My first experience with the Mirage was a few minutes running on the treadmill following a similar run with the Karhu Fast 2's. I wanted to compare these two lightweight shoes under the same conditions. The Karhu's ran adequately (if a bit sloppily) at training pace while the Mirages felt much more dynamic. As I increased the speed of the tread the Mirage stayed with me and the forward balanced forefoot helped me greatly.

I liked the feel of the Mirages so much I broke one of the cardinal rules of running:

"Don't race in new shoes, especially those you haven't yet tried on pavement."

FIRST RACE WITH MIRAGES

Nearing the 5K finish

This race was only a 5K distance so I figured I could endure any issues with break-in. Besides some slight rubbing on one ankle, the Mirages felt stable and familiar. The shoes performed well throughout the race and I didn't give them much thought as I ran. At times I missed the flexibility and super light feel of the Kinvaras, especially near the finish. After the race I trained exclusively with the Mirages for my half marathon training and by race day they had loosened up a little more.

RUNNING THE HALF MARATHON

13.1 miles, no problem

The Mirages had their biggest test the day I ran the LI Half Marathon. I was dealing with a knee issue and debated whether I should run in my Brooks GTS 10's for the additional cushioning. I ultimately decided that the Mirages had proven to be a solid shoe and that I needed to stick with my original plan. I had a tough time over those 13.1 miles, especially on the last 3, but I got through the race. The Mirages handled the 2+ hours of pounding, causing neither a blister nor any type of foot pain. The relatively light weight and well designed forefoot provided an energetic response, even when I had little energy left to expend.

LIFE WITH THE MIRAGE
The Mirages have proven to be a worthy addition to my collection and I would probably appreciate their minimal features more had I tried them before the Kinvaras. Going from the Kinvaras to the Mirages is a bit like trading up from a simple sports car to a luxury GT. This shoe feels good on pavement and it also performed well on the the bridal path in Central Park. It's a well balanced design, feels competent and lands you on your mid-foot. I toggle between the Mirage and Kinvara and the experience is interesting. When I run in the Mirages I miss the barely-there feel of the Kinvaras. When I run in the Kinvaras I miss the Mirage's cozy wrap and its energized response. They are both great shoes.

CONCLUSION
The Mirage is a shoe you can wear for long distance, take to the track for fast intervals, or run on non-technical trails. It treats you well and it feels better with each use. The Mirage's stability control helps maintain efficiency, especially during longer runs. The low profile and small drop between heel and toe help support a mid-foot running style and the cushioning is firm but comfortable. This is a great shoe, another winner from Saucony's growing line of minimalist running shoes.

SUMMARY

What's good:

• Solid platform but still a lightweight
• Small drop enables mid-foot striking
• Stability control for those who need it
• Wraps the foot well

 What can be improved:

• Toebox could be wider
• Collar rubbing on ankle
• Rides a little high for a minimalist shoe

This review by The Emerging Runner

Karhu Fast 2 Fulcrum: Two firm opinions

Men's Karhu Fast 2 Fulcrum_Ride

Karhu Fast 2 Fulcrum Ride 
MSRP: $130.00  http://www.karhu.com/

4/18/2011 UPDATE: http://www.emergingrunner.com/2011/04/karhu-fast-2s-live-up-to-their-name.html

The Emerging Runner and Adventure Girl have been independently testing the Karhu Fast 2 Fulcrum, the Finnish shoe company's newest neutral performance shoe. We did not compare notes until the end but we found ourselves primarily agreeing on how we view these shoes. What follows are our individual impressions along with our collective assessment.

The Emerging Runner's take on the Fast 2 Fulcrum

When it comes to running gear I'm definitely a shoe person. When assessing a running shoe I tend to start with high hopes. I figure that when a company puts serious research into its product their shoe is likely to have some upside. Sometimes this proves out and sometimes I end up disappointed. I've become increasingly interested in minimalism and that has changed my expectation for running shoes. I now look for a shoe that provides: 1) reasonable protection from the ground, 2) a minimal drop between the heel and front and, 3) a relatively low profile. My experience running in the Saucony Kinvaras supports this view. However, every runner is different and every shoe has its fans.

When Karhu sent me a pair of Fast 2 Fulcrums I was excited to try them out. According to Karhu this shoe is targeted to the "race training focused runner seeking a highly responsive running experience." That sounded promising. I watched this video on the Karhu site and was further intrigued.

Karhu is known for its high performance shoes that use "Fulcrum" technology to help move the runner along. The negatives I'd heard about the brand were that the mid-foot fit on some models tended toward the narrow. I asked for a pair of Fast 2 Fulcrums a half size up from normal and that was a good call.

First impressions (before running)

Out of the box these shoes, in iridescent chartreuse with yellow highlights, are both garish and beautiful. They look fast and weigh less than I thought they might (10.1 oz.) based on my first view. No matter how you feel about the fit and performance of the Fast 2 Fulcrums, you cannot argue that the quality of the materials and construction are superb. With running shoes you get two first impressions. The first is when you take them out of the box and put them on for the first time. The second and more relevant measure is when you take them out for a run. More on that later.

The Fast 2 Fulcrums fit me well enough, snug but not tight in the midfoot and toebox, with very slight slippage around the heel. This may be because I'd ordered size 11's vs. my normal 10.5's. Tighter lacing near the top took care of that. Standing in the Fast 2 Fulcrums for the first time was interesting. I'm used to the Kinvara that stands 21 mm at the heel with about a 5 mm ramp angle to the toe height. The Fast 2 Fulcrums stand a towering 36.7 mm with almost 12 mm of drop. Karhu builds a "fulcrum" wedge into the mid-sole in front of the arch that supposedly promotes forward motion. I thought that the fulcrum felt a little unnatural as I walked across the floor for the first time. Still, the shoe was perfectly comfortable and I reserved judgment until I ran.

Putting the Fast 2 Fulcrums to the test
My first report on Emerging Runner stated: "While the Kinvaras are light and very flexible on toe-off, the Fast 2's are very stiff at the front. Far stiffer than any other shoe I own." The Fast 2 Fulcrums seemed to loosen up after repeated runs but I still consider it a stiff shoe. I had hoped for a zippy feel when I hit the street but neither the fulcrum nor the rigid forefoot returned energy like other shoes I've tried. I began to question whether this shoe was a good match for me when I crested a hill and on the way back down felt my stride disrupted. It was as if the shoe and my foot were trying to travel on slightly different vectors. My mental picture at that moment was of a grocery cart with a misaligned wheel. Subsequent runs on the treadmill were better but my satisfaction when running in the Fast 2 Fulcrums never quite matched how I feel when running in the Kinvaras, Grid Tangents or Brooks Adrenalins.

My comments on one such run: "That [doesn't] mean the shoes failed to perform, in fact they took everything I threw at them. It was really about the feel compared to my Kinvaras and GTS-10's that move more naturally with my foot." My last street run with the Fast 2 Fulcrums confirmed that while the Karhu is a good shoe it doesn't really work for my style of running: "I decided to try some quick acceleration to see if the shoe transformed to a quasi-racer when run at higher cadences...The Fast 2's didn't give me the feeling of speed. In fact, during "speed play", they felt less stable than when I ran at my normal pace."

Conclusion
I'll admit that I'm biased against the high ride and the firm forefoot of the Fast 2 Fulcrums. Both attributes run counter to what I look for in a running shoe. The shoe is substantial and its build quality and materials are top notch. The Fast 2 Fulcrum's cushioning is very good considering its relatively light weight. However, though I had hopes of using it as a racing shoe, I found the lack of response from the Fast 2 Fulcrums disappointing. As a general athletic shoe I think they're fine. I've had more than one satisfactory run with the Karhu's on the treadmill and I like wearing them on the elliptical machine. I may even take these shoes out on the road on occasion for a change of pace. However, in the end, the Fast 2 Fulcrums felt neither fast nor agile. Other reviewers may disagree with me (I've seen a couple that do). Fast 2 Fulcrum may provide the desired characteristics that a different runner values. If you are a runner who prefers a low flexible racer trainer you may find this too much shoe for you.

Adventure Girl's take on the Fast 2 Fulcrum

Karhu's marketing of their neutral Fast 2 Fulcrum is honest without embellishment. Their website states that the Fast 2 Fulcrum is for the runner desiring a "firm and responsive ride". True to its name, Karhu has moved the fulcrum of this shoe forward in order to encourage quick stride turnover. The first time I put these shoes on I was tempted to rock back and forth from my midfoot to my toes because the fulcrum point makes a natural rocking motion. And that's exactly what this fulcrum position is encouraging you to do while running--roll forward onto your toes while striding.  This is done to quicken your stride rate and shift you towards forefoot striking.

Woman's Karhu Fast 2 Fulcrum

I haven't yet attempted to transition to a forefoot style of running but every run I've taken with the Karhus has made me conscious of my midfoot landing in a way that seemed to sometimes gently (and sometimes not so gently) nudge me towards a forefoot strike. If I were to exaggerate the sensation of the fulcrum transition I would describe it akin to the sensation of falling forward. The nudging made it feel very much like the Fast 2 Fulcrum's were actively training me. This training was appreciated when I went out for a run with fresh legs, but on the few runs where my legs were less responsive the fulcrum rocking and forefoot encouragement seemed more than I could handle.

Karhu also bills this shoe as firm, which is immediately apparent. Most of my runs have both a sidewalk and a trail component. On the sidewalk I was stuck by the cushioning presence of firm foam between my foot and the concrete. Since I normally run in the minimal Saucony Kinvara this additional protection was surprising. The Karhu foam, however, doesn't provide a sense of springy-ness, but instead dampens the feel of the running surface. For all its cushioning, the Fast 2 Fulcrum weighs in as mid-weight at 9.1oz (for a point of comparison the Kinvara is 6.7oz).

On the trail portion of my runs I found the Fast 2 Fulcrums to perform moderately well on flat, well-packed trails, but it didn't prove to be rugged enough for rocky, slippery, or steep trails. The tread on the Fast 2 Fulcrum isn't very pronounced and the model isn't billed as a trail runner, so the lack of performance on difficult terrain was not unexpected or disappointing.

The woman's Fast 2 Fulcrum is an arresting shade of orange, with yellow accents and sole. I felt conspicuous on the streets while wearing these shoes. At midday this made me self-conscious, even to the point of once deterring me from wearing the Fast 2's when I was meeting a fellow runner I didn't know well. However, at both dusk and dawn, it made me feel more visible to traffic (i.e. safer).

Conclusion
The Karhu Fast 2 Fulcrums will not become my go-to daily trainer, because the fulcrum rocking added unnecessary work to my run and it wasn't a natural fit with my strike and stride. If I decide to make a concerted effort to move toward forefoot striking I think the Fast 2 Fulcrums will be an excellent training shoe to encourage and speed that transition.

Summary

What's Good:

• Quality of materials and construction
• Well ventilated upper
• Light weight
• Fulcrum technology enables mid-foot landing
• Highly visible

What could be improved:

• Forefoot responsiveness
• Lateral stability
• Bulk

This review by the Emerging Runner and Adventure Girl

Running shoe review: Skecher's Resistor Run SRR

Nothing minimal about Skechers' SRR's

Skechers Resistance Runner- Resistor Run SRR

MSRP: $130
Company: http://www.skechers.com/

If someone had told me a few months ago that I would soon be the happy owner of a pair of Skechers running shoes I might have called them crazy. Skechers was not a brand I'd ever associated with athletic shoes, let alone running shoes. I actually found the concept laughable. When Skechers announced the Resistance Runners (part of their Shape Ups line) I had some fun with the idea, mocking the look and the efficacy of the unstable design. The Resistance Runner was not my only target in that post but I did specifically say I'd only run with them in the dark. Soon after my post, Skecher's offered to send me a pair to review. I asked for my size (10.5) in D width and got a call later that day from the company saying they didn't make their shoes in wide sizes. I told woman that if Skechers is going to be in the running shoe business they better learn that D is not a wide size.

My Resistance Runners arrived in a big fancy box with the shoes tucked into foam cutouts and lots of marketing copy. The shoes don't look like any running shoes that I own but they're attractive in their own way. The black and silver motif is a bit over the top but many running shoes, even the top performing models, sometimes suffer from gaudy design. What struck me first was the weight of the shoes. I couldn't find an official weight on any website but I'd guess that these shoes weigh between 14 and 16 ounces. Compare that to the 7.7 oz. Saucony Kinvaras and right away you know it will be a different running experience.

When I first put on the shoes I found that they were tight compared to other size 10.5 shoes I own, especially in the toe box. I like a more open fit at the front and I was concerned that I'd develop blisters from having my toes restricted. Standing in the shoes was interesting and novel. The asymmetrical mid-sole creates an unstable rocking experience when standing still. Unlike my minimal Kinvaras, the shoe is highly engineered. The mid-sole and out-sole are constructed like a counter-lever and the ride is high. I didn't know what to expect before taking off on my first run but I knew the experience would be different.

My first run with the SRR's actually surprised me. I was prepared to dislike them but instead I found them...interesting. The following is from an EmergingRunner.com post in mid October:

"The SRRs are beefy and you notice them when you run. It reminds me of the articles I've read about soldiers who run marathons with a field pack and combat boots. The shoes are clunky and the stride is a little awkward, yet I found myself appreciating them for this purpose. I could feel the shifting pressure on my legs and calves and I noted that my right upper hamstring did not feel as sore as it has of late. That may not be related to the shoes but it's clear that the SRRs do distribute force differently than a standard shoe.

Between the rain and the heavy running shoes I might have expected to dislike this morning's run. Instead, I found the cool temperatures and light rain refreshing, as well as the feeling that I was gaining some additional training benefits from the more challenging footwear. I guess "not unpleasant" is a pretty good way of putting it."

I've now run with the SRR's half a dozen times and I even wore them during the Nissequogue Turkey Trot on Thanksgiving day.  I purposely wore the SRR's to help me mitigate my pace while I ran with my wife and kids. The shoes performed well that day although I had a scare when I landed on the sloped edge of a blacktop path that twisted my foot and ankle sharply. The high ride of the shoes invite these opportunities for unstable misseps. Needless to say, I won't be running with the SRR's on the trails.

While the unstable platform can lead to stumbles I've come to see that the SRR's, with their constantly shifting center of gravity and soft cushioning underfoot, remind me of the trail running experience. I was originally concerned that the unstable SRR's would affect my running form, hurt my knees or aggravate my leg muscles. So far the experience has been the opposite and my legs usually feel energized after a run. I'll continue to run (and occasionally walk) with the SRR's, using them as a tool to cultivate leg strength and flexibility. I wouldn't recommend these shoes as a replacement for a daily trainer and I doubt I'll ever use them for runs longer than four miles but I do think they add value to a runner's routine.

Skechers Resistance Runner - Resistor Run SRR

What's good:
Unstable mid-sole facilitates variable leg and ankle workout
Weight of shoes contributes to strength training
Running experience is fun and unusual


What could be improved:
Narrow fit in toe box
Less bulk and more minimal construction
Price point


This review by the Emerging Runner

Princeton Tec Fuel running headlamp: The easy choice

Some people run in the dark because their energy level peaks in the evening or they prefer the quiet of the early morning. Others have little choice -- their daily priorities dictate their workout schedule and sometimes 4:00 AM or 10:00 PM is all that's available to them. Running in the dark can provide an interesting experience, but it also puts a runner at great risk for safety issues. A smart runner always runs against traffic and stays aware of his or her surroundings. Reflective clothing should always be worn. Running headlamps provide an even greater level of safety. Not only do they light the way, they also make the runner highly visible on the road.

For the last two years I have been running with a Petzl Tikka Plus headlamp most mornings at 4:00 AM. This lightweight device provides me a safety benefit without adding distraction to my experience. That's really all you can ask for in a headlamp. The Running Geek, a fairly hardcore runner, will be participating in a round-the-clock marathon at the end of the year. He is testing out running headlamps and below is his review of the Princeton Tec Fuel 4-LED unit. -TER

Princeton Tec Fuel Headlamp

MSRP $26.99

Princeton Tec: http://www.princetontec.com/

 The new 4-LED Princeton Tec Fuel headlamp is a suitable choice for runners due to its long battery life, bright light and light weight.  I purchased this headlamp from Amazon.com for $26.99 for possible use during my 24-hour marathon in December.  I was initially concerned that wearing a strap around my head with a weighted light would give me a headache.  I am happy to report that this was a non-issue for the hour and a half of my initial test.

The Princeton Tec website says that the light “weighs only 78g with 43 lumens of brightness and 146 hours of burn time.”  It also states that the light has "an asymmetrical single arm bracket that makes directing the light effortless and reliable; a large, easy to find push button switch and a virtually bulletproof, easy access battery door that protects the 3AAAs and its electronics.”  

My initial expectations were immediately dampened when I tried to load the 3 AAA batteries into the headlamp and was not able to open the battery door without a pry tool.  Lo and behold, Princeton Tec thought of everything.  There is a tab on the head strap adjuster that is made specifically for the task of accessing the battery door.

The Tec Fuel headlamp is very light. After only a couple of minutes of running it was easy to forget that it was on my head as I ran.  Aiming the light was easy and, once set,  I had no concerns about it slipping to a new aim point.  The On/Off switch is easy to locate by feel and to use, yet it was not prone to accidental activation while in my backpack. The lamp has three intensity settings plus a flashing mode but the differences in the 3 light settings were almost imperceptible.  I continuously set the Tec Fuel to its brightest setting for over 48 hours with no degradation in brightness and no issues with heat. I can’t validate the 146 hour claim, but I suspect that it is only true when the lamp is used at its lowest setting.    

With all its “easy” attributes (easy battery door, easy on/off switch, easy aim adjustment, and easy to forget on your head) this light should have been called the “Easy” rather than the “Fuel.” That said, I did find some issues that force me to consider other headlamps for my upcoming marathon. Although the light was bright and shined far, it had a somewhat narrow throw.  The result was like wearing a set of slightly too small sunglasses that made the world brighter rather than darker.  This is a minor complaint and probably a non-issue, but now that I have some experience with lightweight headlamps my curiosity is piqued regarding similar offerings in this product's price category.  Plus I am a real gear geek.  More to follow...

This Review by The Running Geek, contribution by The Emerging Runner

Long term review: Five minimalist shoes, combat tested

After reading the book “Born to Run” by Christopher McDougall and studying the “Chi Running” video by Danny Dreyer I figured I was ready to try a new form of running. I chose a style that mimics the action of barefoot running by landing on the ball of the foot, rather than on the heel. I had been away from running for six months due to a deployment to Iraq and realized that the slow build back into running form was a great time to incorporate a new stride. But what shoe to use? Well, I consider myself a long distance runner and view a half marathon as a short run. I run between 60 and 80 miles per week but I'm not super fast, with a marathon time just over 3:30. Try as I may, I was unable to toughen the soles of my feet enough to run barefoot. I had no problem with the strength of my toes, arch and calf as they developed just fine. I just had to have some form of shoes. What follows are the five shoes I tried and my opinions about each.

Vibram FiveFingers KSO. (list price $85.00)

I paid $129 for a new pair of Vibram FiveFingers KSO's in size 43, in black, from AJFastDeals on eBay (www.myworld.ebay.com.sg/ajfastdeals). These shoes were difficult to find in my size and most vendors would not ship them to an Army Post Office. That accounts for the high price. The Vibrams weigh 5.7 ounces and were immediately comfortable on my bare feet. Walking around in them did make me self conscious but not so much that I wouldn't wear them. I spent a week using them only for walking and to do short sets of strides. I was concerned that the seams in the toe area would cause blistering but I never experienced any problems. Over the course of seven runs I worked up to a maximum distance of 12 miles in these shoes for a total of 47 miles. I finally gave up the experiment when I constantly developed blisters on the inside edge of the ball of my foot at any distance greater than 6 miles, regardless of the use of BodyGlide. I gave the shoes to a friend who uses them every day for weight lifting .

Mizuno Universe 3. (list price $119.99)

I paid $107.99 for a size 10.5 pair of Mizuno Universe 3's from Road Runner Sports (http://www.roadrunnersports.com/). The 3's weigh  a mere 3.6 ounces. Since I was familiar with Mizuno shoes there were no surprises with the very comfortable slipper-like fit. This is the lightest running shoe I have ever used and I had concerns about the lack of padding and the durability of the shoe. It turns out that there is enough protection at the ball of the foot to allow for running on a 130 degree day on the asphalt (Najaf, Iraq not Badwater). The upper is very breathable and it dried quickly, making it a very comfortable hot weather shoe. I was surprised by the superb, almost magical, traction provided by the strategically placed tread. The thin sole provides just enough padding to absorb some impact and insulate from extreme temperatures while still giving the foot an excellent feel for the ground.

I usually retire my shoes at 300 miles and did not expect these flimsy feeling Mizunos to last even that long, but due to slow mail delivery I ended up putting 517 miles on the Universe 3's. The longest run I'd done in these shoes was 18 miles and at around mile 490 I became aware that the padding of the shoe was beginning to break down. This impressive shoe has earned a permanent place in my running shoe rotation. It will be part of my kit for the New York Marathon in November and the Peanut Island 24-Hour Marathon in December. There are now two fresh pair in my closet and I feel that these shoes have set the bar by which all other minimalist shoes will be measured.

Adidas adiZero Rocket (list price $84.99)

I paid $76.49 for a size 10.5 pair of Adidas adiZero Rockets from Road Runner Sports (http://www.roadrunnersports.com/). The Rockets weigh 7.5 ounces. This shoe almost provides as much cushion as a conventional shoe (although less than the Green Silence) but retains outstanding forefoot flexibility and a very minimal heel drop. Running in these shoes was very similar to running in the Mizunos but the irregularities of the ground are not transmitted as acutely to the balls of your feet. The extra weight makes the Mizunos feel even lighter in comparison. I have a 24-Hour Ultra Marathon coming up on a course constructed of paving stones. After running 177 miles in the adiZero Rockets, I have decided that they will be one of three shoes in the rotation for that race. The upper is very breathable and the lacing system keeps the shoe firmly in place. Environmentally, these shoes are worth considering as they are manufactured in the United States resulting in cleaner factories as well as reduced shipping impact. This is a great shoe at a good price.

Nike Air Zoom Katana Rac3r III (list price $108.99)

I paid $53.96 for a size 10.5 pair Nike Air Zoom Katana Rac3r III's from Road Runner Sports (http://www.roadrunnersports.com/). The III's weigh 6.3 ounces. I have been a long time abstainer of Nike shoes although from 1984 until 1990 I ran almost exclusively in Nike Pegasus shoes. Some time in the 90’s, in their rush for innovation (or more numerous model changes to help sell more shoes), the Pegasus changed. With it, the entire line of Nike shoes seemed to no longer fit my feet because they would squeeze my toes unless they were so big that my heel flopped around. In recent years I have been hearing how Nike has improved again and that the “too small toe-box” was a quickly fading bad memory. These shoes not only fit the description of what I was looking for, their sale price could not be beat.

The Katana Rac3r III's are the closest I've found to the Mizuno Universe 3. The additional weight of the III's probably comes from the conventional looking tread material and the sole that, while not as flexible as the Mizuno's, did provide excellent feel for the running surface. The toe box is a bit tight in typical Nike fashion, but not as bad as I remembered. This results in a bit less use of splayed toes for finding footing than the Mizuno’s allow. Otherwise, this is a great shoe at a great price. After 210 miles I can say that the shoe performs well, has sufficient traction and may have slightly longer lasting cushioning (If the shoes are retired at 300 miles, this is a non issue). Due to my aversion to the tight toe box, I did not order another pair, but if you are comfortable with Nike shoes and want to try a minimalist shoe, this is definitely the shoe for you.

Brooks Green Silence (list price $100.00)

I paid $75 for a size 10.5 pair of Brooks Green Silence from Brooks Pro Community (http://www.brooks.promotive.com/). The Green Silence's weigh 6.9 ounces. A bit of truth in advertising is needed here. I wrote a letter to Brooks complaining that their products were not available to deployed Soldiers, Sailors, Airmen and Marines due to their shipping policies. Brooks wrote back stating that we could purchase shoes through their online Pro Community and that the shipping problem would not affect purchases made there. Additionally they would give us 25% off every purchase through this program up to $1,000 a year. All we had to do was go to their special website and apply for an account which would be approved in less than 7 days. I was attracted to these shoes for a number of reasons. The Green Silence seemed to fit the mold of a lightweight racing flat that can be used for long distance, barefoot style running. They are also designed and constructed with attention to the environmental impact of the shoe. The shoes are made with water-based adhesives, non-toxic soy based dyes and inks, 75% post-consumer recycled material and a biodegradable midsole, insole and collar.

All this new design engineering makes me a bit concerned about durability. And frankly, while they are not as weird looking as the FiveFingers, they do come close. The Left shoe is predominantly red while the right shoe is predominantly yellow. The colors seem to be a perfect match for Ronald McDonald -- they could be clown shoes. The Green Silence don’t generate the same weird looks I've received while wearing the Vibram FiveFingers. Instead they attract attention without the ridicule. Unfortunately I had to give them away to another Soldier because they were too small for my feet. I ordered a replacement pair of size 11 shoes. The assessment that follows is a combination of my observations as well as those of the Soldier who is now using those shoes.

The Green Silence may be considered minimalist when viewed from the perspective of the upper, but the sole has plenty of padding especially when compared to the Mizuno Universe. There is not as much heel drop as is found on a conventional trainer so a midfoot/forefoot landing, while not essential in this shoe, is still recommended. For its weight the Green Silence has plenty of underfoot padding. The lacing system and integrated tongue flap takes a little getting used to. Once mastered, it is deceptively fast, making this a decent choice for triathlons. The upper is very breathable and yet has enough padding as well as toe protection that I would not be adverse to using the Silence as a light trail shoe.

In terms of durability, the shoes now have 103 miles on them (1/3rd of the way through the planned lifespan and there are no visible issues so far). The padding is not breaking down and getting them wet has not caused the shoe to fall apart. There is room for improvement on the eco front as these shoes are made in China (according to the box they came in) but Brooks has set the standard for eco friendly shoes and has produced an outstanding racing shoe that is appropriate for training too. They have managed to create a shoe with much more environmental consciousness while not sacrificing any of the performance and durability that we have come to expect in our running gear. Brooks has set the bar very high. This is the shoe by which all other eco friendly shoes will be measured. Of note; Scott Jurek set a new American 24 Hour Marathon Record in a pair of Green Silence on a 0.78 mile course of pavement and dirt full of tight “Formula One” turns at 165.7 miles. I plan to use them for my own 24 hour marathon on December 31st 2010.

Lower numbers = better

 

Note that this chart proves that the choice of shoes is very personal. The Nikes were not as favored by me as the Adidas or the Brooks. I hope my experience with these shoes can help others choose the minimal shoe that serves them best. Besides my recommendations please try the shoes in a store before you buy to ensure a satisfying fit. Companies today are churning out more and more varieties of minimalists shoes. I am sure there is something out there for everyone.

This review by The Running Geek

Saucony's Kinvara - a minimalist shoe that's simply beautiful

Website: Saucony.com
Price: MSRP $90

Don't be deceived by its featherweight construction and racy looks. The Saucony Kinvara is a substantial running shoe

Prior to testing both the Kinvaras and Grid Tangent 4's I had never owned a pair of Sauconys. I'll admit I was interested in the brand because so many people that I know love the fit and feel of Saucony running shoes. I had tried on various pairs of Sauconys from time to time and found them very comfortable. However, unless they just don't fit your foot at all, most running shoes feel good on the carpet of a running store. It's not until you put them to pavement (or on the trail) that you understand how a given shoe compares to your standards for comfort, support and durability. When Saucony offered Runner's Tech Review the chance to try the new Kinvaras we were extremely excited to put them to the test. These shoes, with their ultralight weight, minimal construction and low (4 mm) drop between heel and forefoot, were exactly what Born to Run fans (those who prefer shoes over bare feet or sandals) would want. Plus, they are about the coolest looking running shoes out there.

Both Adventure Girl and I received our Kinvaras back in May and immediately started running with them. We were careful to keep our distances fairly short to protect ourselves from straining those muscles and tendons that are usually protected by our more built up running shoes. She and I have had different experiences with the Kinvaras so we're providing our personal perspectives below.

Saucony Kinvara (Men's)

The Emerging Runner
My first impression of the Kinvaras (that I reported on emergingrunner.com) was that they "felt more like a slipper than a running shoe. Once I began to walk in them and got a sense of how they worked with the foot I realized they were nicely responsive." I'm a 9:00 to 9:30 minute miler but the first couple of times that I ran with the Kinvaras I averaged about 8:45 per mile. As I said on that day's post: "I have to give credit to the shoes for helping me attain that pace since I can't think of another factor that would explain it."

Despite my lower than average arches and tendency to pronate I haven't had any problems adapting to this shoe. I've usually done well with neutral trainers (except for Nikes) but for longer runs I still prefer some stability control. Since all my runs with the Kinvaras have been under six miles I may not have passed the threshold where the lack of control impacts my comfort. Despite the minimal construction of the Kinvara, Saucony provides enough cushioning in the midsole and surprisingly good structure in the "barely-there" upper to produce a very stable ride. The counter of the shoe is very flexible and it contributes to the slipper-like feel but the lacing system keeps it all in place.

I thought I would use the Kinvaras as a race shoe (and I may eventually do that) but I'm thinking of them more as lightweight trainers that are helping me develop a mid-foot running style. Saucony has also provided a pair of Grid Tangent 4's which are extremely lightweight cushioned stability shoes and I have raced with them once. I'll review them on this site as soon as I have more experience with them in competition. So far I've been impressed with their fit, feel and performance.

Emerging Runner's Bottom line:
Prior to Saucony's launching the Kinvaras I was closely considering the Brooks Green Silence shoe. The folks at JackRabbit discouraged me from moving to them as a daily trainer and I went the other way with the Brooks Adrenalin GTS-10's. It was the right advice, but it left a gap in my shoe portfolio. The Kinvaras fill that gap handily and they deliver everything I need for the distances I routinely cover. I can see myself choosing the Kinvaras more often as I continue to develop my mid-foot running style. I'd like to see how these shoes feel on a run closer to ten miles and I suspect I'll still be happy with the results.

Adventure Girl
Saucony's ProGrid Kinvara is the first minimalist running shoe that I have ever tried. For the last few years I have used one of the more mildly stabilizing shoes on the market. Since I've often questioned whether I needed the stabilizing at all and love my footwear to be lightweight, I was excited to try the Kinvara.

Having now run with the Kinvaras for a month, I've found that it’s an excellent choice for your ‘first time minimalist’ because it provides a surprising level of cushioning for its feather-like weight and structure. Anyone who has read Born to Run and is working on developing a “light and easy” style of running (a mantra I frequently find myself silently repeating to myself on tough runs) will find the Kinvaras an aid. You can hardly feel the weight of the sneaker when it’s in your hand and it’s even more invisible on foot.

At first, I ran with the Kinvaras on trails with rolling hills. I found that the ankle support wasn’t adequate, which led to a ‘tweaky’ feeling in my right ankle. So, I saved the Kinvaras for runs on paved bike paths and it was there that they, and I, began to hit our stride. I enjoyed their feel more with each use, as long as I stuck to paved routes.

The minimalist construction provides ample ventilation, which makes the shoe an excellent choice for runs on hot summer days. (On the flip side, I think they’ll be too chilly for my toes in the winter.) The mesh that encases the shoes has been dressed up with graphics. On my women’s version of the shoes the graphics are a refreshing grass green. There’s also a blue version available.

Saucony Kinvara (Woman's)

Adventure Girl's Bottom Line:
I recommend adding the Kinvaras to your wardrobe as a second pair of shoes for days when you’d like to feel light and run fast (race day?!). From here on out, I’ll be considering the Kinvaras my go-to footwear for fun running that steers clear of trails and rugged terrain.

Reviewed by Adventure Girl and the Emerging Runner

ATAYNE clothing: A great combination of quality and mission

ATAYNE's clothing carries the message of their mission

ATAYNE: http://www.atayne.com/

Last December, Runner's Tech Review received two technical shirts from ATAYNE, a clothing company that produces high quality, environmentally sustainable athletic apparel. These shirts were created with polyethylene terephthalate (PET) from recycled plastic bottles or as ATAYNE likes to say--trash. According to the ATAYNE website, these shirts use 2/3rds of the energy and only 10% of the water required to produce equivalent shirts of virgin PET. Runner's Tech Review loves sustainably produced products but we also have high expectations for performance. The ATAYNE shirts we received are well made, substantial, and look attractive. Many of their offerings are printed with words and pictures that convey a positive environmental message.

Receiving our short sleeved shirts in early winter limited our ability to test them outdoors except on unseasonably warm days. As mentioned above, the shirts are substantial and heavier than most other technical jerseys. Fittingly, my first experience with my ATAYNE shirt was on a run at Stillwell Woods in Syosset, NY. I went out on a chilly, 25 degree day using the ATAYNE jersey as a bottom layer with a long sleeved tech shirt on top. This combination provided warmth, but I did find myself sweating within the first mile of my run. The ATAYNE shirt did a very good job of absorbing sweat but the second layer trapped the moisture and inhibited its evaporation. I did notice that even after drying, the shirt carried little or no sweat odor, making it possible to wear more than once between washes. The next couple of times I wore this shirt I was indoors on the treadmill. In both cases heat was a factor and I again experienced good absorption, but the material did collect a lot of moisture.

I refrained from using this shirt through the rest of the winter months but resumed wearing it during my 4:00 AM weekday runs in early spring. Running in temperatures between 35 and 45 degrees, the ATAYNE shirt yielded an excellent combination of sweat wicking and evaporation. I appreciated the shirt's thicker and heavier material that kept me warmer at the start of a cold morning run than my other short sleeve technical shirts. My two most recent experiences running with this shirt reinforced its relative effectiveness in different weather conditions. A late April run under partly cloudy skies with temperatures below 50 degrees proved just perfect for the capabilities of the jersey. Even after covering five miles with many hills the shirt kept up with me. However, a more recent run in 76 degree heat, with sun and humidity, seemed to overwhelm its wicking properties.

Adventure Girl found that the woman's cut was flattering, although the sizes run on the small side. The weight of the fabric was less of an issue during her trial runs, but she agrees that it won't be a go-to item in mid-summer heat. Given that the shirt performed well, AG is excited about the prospect of supporting a company with strong environmental ethics and practices. ATAYNE is a B Corporation, which means it is legally required to consider the impact of their decisions on the long-term interests of their employees, suppliers, community, consumers, and the environment. It's also based in Maine, a state for which AG has a soft spot. Although it's product line is more limited, ATAYNE's mission and approach to manufacturing clothing makes it something of an east coast version of the venerable Patagonia.

What's good:

High quality construction
Substantial feel
Thermal
Moisture absorption
Better than average odor resistance

Price (check out the outlet for lots of options under $20!)
Style
Company ethics and mission

What can be improved:
Moisture evaporation

Website

Both The Emerging Runner and Adventure Girl are keen to add more ATAYNE products to their running gear collections.

This review by the Emerging Runner and Adventure Girl